[TMIC] The Supreme Court has said........part 2

Robert and Marabeth (74541.2151(AT)compuserve.com)
Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:46:38 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: FHargr3092(AT)aol.com: "Re: [TMIC] not tm baby update"
Previous message: Robert and Marabeth: "[TMIC] The Supreme Court has said..........."

..that those of us out there with impaired vision need no protection
because the medical profession can make us see well again.....huh.....???
Well, I for one, don't agree wholely with that. While my visual problems
have indeed improved thanx to medical intervention, I don't think that the
worser cases of visual deterioration due to TM-MS should be excluded from
being considered to be disabling.
I guess the S.C. thinks than one must be totally blind for that status to
be conferred.
Any one else care to comment.......????

Bobby Jim in Memphis, where it's hazy hot and humid again, but not as bad
as in Arizona.

Next message: FHargr3092(AT)aol.com: "Re: [TMIC] not tm baby update"
Previous message: Robert and Marabeth: "[TMIC] The Supreme Court has said..........."