Re: Fwd: Pain from SCI

Jo Ellen Finkelstein (ghellen(AT)ninenet.com)
Sun, 28 Mar 1999 00:59:24 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: James R. Davis: "Another question..."
Previous message: Koliver (AT)tstar.net: "Re: OT-Mandy & Peter"
Maybe in reply to: Gunny0011(AT)aol.com: "Fwd: Pain from SCI"

Gunny0011(AT)aol.com wrote:
>
> What's wrong with us in this picture?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: Pain from SCI
> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 09:48:03 -0500
> From: vmiller(AT)etherdome.mgh.harvard.edu
> To: Gunny0011(AT)aol.com
>
> Thank you for responding to my posting on the Internet about research we
> are doing on medications for pain from spinal cord injury. However,
> individuals whose pain is a result of transverse myelitis are not eligible
> for the study.
>
> Again, thank you for your response, and I wish you the best of luck.
>
> Sincerely,
> Victoria Miller, Study CoordinatorHi Gunny, Joellen here. Most researchers and Doctors consider SCI to be
TRAMATIC spinal cord injury as in: had an accident and cord was damaged.
Our kind of injury doesn't fall in their definition of SCI, (don't
know about you but it felt pretty TRAMATIC to me!!!!) but MS and TM are
evidently in a different catigory. So any studies on SCI leaves us
dangling in the breeze. Joellen

Next message: James R. Davis: "Another question..."
Previous message: Koliver (AT)tstar.net: "Re: OT-Mandy & Peter"
Maybe in reply to: Gunny0011(AT)aol.com: "Fwd: Pain from SCI"