Re: Neuros

Johnnie DeGrand (jdegrand(AT)up.net)
Tue, 24 Nov 1998 20:09:47 -0500

<x-html>

Even tho Jake's Neuro's were all very knowledgable and helpful, I thought you all might get a kick out of the fact that one of them was a very large-boned, deep-voiced women...that used to be a man.

----------
> From: by way of James Lubin <jlubin(AT)eskimo.com> <JHarper33(AT)aol.com>
> To: tmic-list(AT)eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: Neuros
> Date: Tuesday, November 24, 1998 3:36 PM
>
> Hi Doc~
>
> I thought you just said earlier you had a good one.
> Of the five neurologists I saw -- four in the hospital and one later at Emory
> -- none of them were as you describe, though one did have the sensitivity of a
> broom handle. :-)   I imagine there are many like you describe, but probably
> in every branch of medicine, though, really, through various ailments and
> surgeries, I don't think I've met any dr. like that personally.
> That was my main point, that they are all individuals rather than all a
> certain type.
>
> Barbara H.
>
>
> In a message dated 11/23/98 5:53:41 PM EST, doc09(AT)sprintmail.com writes:
>
> > Barb:
> >  
> >  My three cents are that it is nice to defend a class
> >  of people, neuro's, when it is warranted. I have no
> >  problem giving them their due but other people go
> >  to school and get advanced degree's and they don't
> >  think they are some form of deity. If there is anything
> >  wrong, in general, it is their inability to say, "I Don't
> >  Know". God forbid they should make such a
> >  statement. Somebody might find out they are
> >  fallible. Defend them all you want but it falls
> >  on deaf ears here until they, as a class, can act
> >  a bit more real.
> >  
> >  Doc
>
>