> ----------
> From: RCookHook(AT)aol.com[SMTP:RCookHook(AT)aol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 1998 8:58 AM
> To: lbthrone(AT)HOTMAIL.COM tmic-list(AT)eskimo.com annlindstrom(AT)lucent.com
> MTripimcca(AT)aol.com
> Subject: Re: I really don't want to be a spoil sport......
>
>
> The problem as I now know it is that some people use computer servers that
> are
> not theirs, and even though they may not open the unrelated TM e-mail,
> their
> computer-serves still stores the information on the hard drive for
> forwarding
> to the company net recipient. This is kinda like Lubin's server that
> sends
> the e-mail to us and any item sent through it gets permanently stored and
> takes up valuable hard drive storage space.
>
> We each like to communicate back and forth and love to cheer each other up
> maybe with inspirations, kisses, thoughtful cards, etc: Remember, that
> all
> that takes up storage on not only Lubin's hard drive, but the hard drive
> of
> those that use intra company net servers as well - also, mine because I
> store
> them for long periods of time before "cleaning house".
>
> Matters that are also forwarded to the LIST also takes up a lot of drive
> space
> because it also includes all the sources that were used in forwarding the
> mail. I recommend not forwarding mail, but copying it and pasting it in
> the
> body of the e-mail to the LIST.
>
> I would place hyper links or web addresses to my "FYI" stuff, but most of
> it
> is not accessible to you as you have to be a source member and the
> addresses
> will not work, otherwise I would be able to save drive-server space also
> by
> doing that.
>
> Ann is being given the privilege of using her company computer intra net
> server to communicate with the LIST, and all mail if permanently stored on
> it,
> taking up drive space. I also know that some others on the LIST also use
> their employer's computer to access the LIST because they do not have a
> personal computer.
>
> Resolution?????
>
> May we not sent non-related material to the LIST, but to personally those
> of
> us that we think would otherwise be able to enjoy the subjects, and not
> cause
> the others that have a privilege of their employer to access the LIST who
> do
> not wish to abuse that valuable privilege? I think this would best serve
> us
> all for the purpose we are here...HERE I GO, AGAIN, THINKING!!!!!!!
>
> Bob from Houston
>