Doc and Janie,
I agree with you and said so to some recent newbie.
However, when Lynda posted her original questionnaire
a while back, I answered it on 7/18. My response
did give information that I had never mentioned
elsewhere, mostly because the question wordings
prompted such additional info. Yes, the questions
might have been related to some sort of trap or
scam; as a trusting person, I didn't even consider
the possibility then. I still think it was honest.
I would even guess she is a student, savvy in TM,
ignorant of common courtesy.
To my knowledge, no one else answered her. The recent
resending may reflect her response to this lack of
our response. Unlike my recent guidance to a newbie,
I don't believe anyone told her to read the archives.
And breaking up the long questionnaire into short
questions, might be her way of dealing with the lack
of responses.
>From an examination of her posts, I would guess that
she doesn't know tiddly about how to use these
resources, including EMAIL.
And yes, she was annoying in the extreme. Jim Lubin
should consider pulling her off the registered list
unless she can explain/redeem herself.
Alton, the innocent