It was the blockage of a tiny artery and the tiny
region of affected tissue that could not be seen.
I was surprised to hear this [and should have
pursued the point], because an MRI is sensitive
enough to pick up the scar tissue (lesions) of
MS damage. In my case all the MRI's and spinal
fluid tests were declared normal, ruling out
tumors, MS, G-B, and bone spurs.
R Bennett wrote:
> . What about us TM'ers who had MRI's which showed
> a growth of some type in the spine? In my case,
> the Dr's thought it was a spinal tumor, but surgery
> and a biopsy ruled that out. So are the growths
> related to something else?
Evidently. I dunno.
Alton