Re: Personal Conflicts on the list
DC Jones (jones(AT)tdl.com)
Fri, 05 Dec 1997 19:43:04 -0800
Jeff Farney wrote:
>
> I had it brought to my attention a while back that a person didn't agree
> with what I was writing. We went back and forth on the list, before I
> decided to write to this person confidentially to explain my view, and gain
> somewhat of a pen-pal. After I first mailed I got a response back wanting to
> get past arguing, and talk about "normal" stuff. But, during the letter this
> person still questioned my stand on this issue, so I sent another letter
> further stating my opinion, and agreeing to quit quarreling, and talk about
> other stuff. I didn't hear back for a while, so I sent another letter.
> Nothing again, so I sent a letter with the subject of "On Vaction?" Still no
> reply. I've came to the conclusion that all anybody wants is "glazed over",
> positive, don't hurt anybody's fragile feelings responses, since most seem
> to be self-proclaimed TM experts.
>
> Jeff
>
> Ryno
> jfarney(AT)nckcn.com
______________________________________________
So what is your point Jeff?
You know I hear the anger, frustration, desperation, and bravado in your
posts and the posts of Gunny and I can understand it. My uncle had the
same outlook and when after exhausting all avenues of therapy for his MS
[o, have you heard of barometric therapy] he took a 12gauge cure to the
chest and that fixed everything.
You don't want it sugarcoated so here it is; if your nerves are
screwed-up nine times out of ten your screwed in some way for life.
Only thing you have real control of, is how long that life goes on.